The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Photo of Amir Naghibi

Amir Naghibi

Researcher

Photo of Amir Naghibi

Assessment and comparison of combined bivariate and AHP models with logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Chaharmahal-e-Bakhtiari Province, Iran

Author

  • Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini
  • Seyed Naim Emami
  • Naser Tahmasebipour
  • Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
  • Amir Naghibi
  • Seyed Abdolhossein Arami
  • Biswajeet Pradhan

Summary, in English

Landslide is one of the most important natural hazards that make numerous financial damages and life losses each year in the worldwide. Identifying the susceptible areas and prioritizing them in order to provide an efficient susceptibility management is very vital. In current study, a comparative analysis was made between combined bivariate and AHP models (bivariate-AHP) with a logistic regression. At first, landslide inventory map of the study area was prepared using extensive field surveys and aerial photographs interpretation. In the next step, nine landslide causative factors were selected including altitude, slope percentage, slope aspect, lithology, distance from faults, streams and roads, land use, and precipitation which affect occurrence of the landslides in the study area. Subsequently, landslide susceptibility maps were produced using weighted (AHP) bivariate and logistic regression models. Finally, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used in order to evaluate the prediction capability of the mentioned models for landslide susceptibility mapping. According to the results, the combined bivariate and AHP models provided slightly higher prediction accuracy than logistic regression model. The combined bivariate and AHP, and logistic regression models had the area under the curve (AUC-ROC) values of 0.914, and 0.865, respectively. The resultant landslide susceptibility maps can be useful in appropriate watershed management practices and for sustainable development in the regions with similar conditions.

Publishing year

2016

Language

English

Publication/Series

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

Volume

9

Issue

3

Document type

Article

Publisher

Springer Nature

Keywords

  • Combined bivariate and AHP models
  • GIS
  • Iran
  • Landslide susceptibility
  • Logistic regression
  • SDG 15 - Life on Land

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1866-7511