The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Photo of Amir Naghibi

Amir Naghibi

Researcher

Photo of Amir Naghibi

Groundwater spring potential modelling : Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches

Author

  • Omid Rahmati
  • Amir Naghibi
  • Himan Shahabi
  • Dieu Tien Bui
  • Biswajeet Pradhan
  • Ali Azareh
  • Elham Rafiei-Sardooi
  • Aliakbar Nazari Samani
  • Assefa M. Melesse

Summary, in English

Sustainable water resources management in arid and semi-arid areas needs robust models, which allow accurate and reliable predictive modeling. This issue has motivated the researchers to develop hybrid models that offer solutions on modelling problems and accurate predictions of groundwater potential zonation. For this purpose, this research aims to investigate the capability and robustness of a novel hybrid model, namely the logistic model tree (LMT) and compares it with state-of-the-art models such as the support vector machine and C4.5 models that locate potential zones for groundwater springs. A spring location dataset consisting of 359 springs was provided by field surveys and national reports and from which three different sample data sets (S1–S3) were randomly prepared (70% for training and 30% for validation). Additionally, 16 spring-related factors were analyzed using regression logistic analysis to find which factors play a significant role in spring occurrence. Twelve significant geo-environmental and morphometric factors were identified and applied in all models. The accuracy of models was evaluated by three different threshold-dependent and –Independent methods including efficiency (E), true skill statistic (TSS), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) methods. Results showed that the LMT model had the highest accuracy performance for all three validation datasets (Emean = 0.860, TSSmean = 0.718, AUC-ROCmean = 0.904); although a slight sensitivity to change in input data was sometimes observed for this model. Furthermore, the findings showed that relative slope position (RSP) was the most important factor followed by distance from faults and lithology.

Publishing year

2018

Language

English

Pages

248-261

Publication/Series

Journal of Hydrology

Volume

565

Document type

Article

Publisher

Elsevier

Keywords

  • GIS
  • Groundwater spring
  • Hybrid model
  • Logistic model tree
  • Robustness

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0022-1694