Nina Gren
Researcher
Occupied Intimacies : Borderization in Palestine, Georgia and Western Sahara
Author
Summary, in English
In this article we explore and compare three different cases of military occupation:
the Israeli occupation of Palestine; the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara; and the Russian occupation of Georgian South Ossetia. Building on ethnographic fieldworks carried out in 2022 and 2023, we show that these contemporary military occupations manifest themselves as evolving processes of dominance which extend beyond direct military force and violence and into the intimate social relationships of their subjects. Control is exercised through multiple acts of ‘borderisation’, which causes separation and rupture by placing people on different sides of physical and bureaucratic borders. This, we demonstrate, effectively disrupts occupied peoples’ ability to do family. Being unable to take your elderly relative to a doctor’s appointment or to visit the grave of your deceased brother are not only practical obstacles, but they also have moral and
existential implications. The disruption of kinship practices should therefore not be taken lightly. Rather, this is revealed as a core mode of domination and control, which threatens intimate aspects of life. Ultimately, the effects of this go beyond individual tragedies and unfulfilled kinship obligations. As the occupations become protracted, social divisions as well as cultural transformations are cemented
the Israeli occupation of Palestine; the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara; and the Russian occupation of Georgian South Ossetia. Building on ethnographic fieldworks carried out in 2022 and 2023, we show that these contemporary military occupations manifest themselves as evolving processes of dominance which extend beyond direct military force and violence and into the intimate social relationships of their subjects. Control is exercised through multiple acts of ‘borderisation’, which causes separation and rupture by placing people on different sides of physical and bureaucratic borders. This, we demonstrate, effectively disrupts occupied peoples’ ability to do family. Being unable to take your elderly relative to a doctor’s appointment or to visit the grave of your deceased brother are not only practical obstacles, but they also have moral and
existential implications. The disruption of kinship practices should therefore not be taken lightly. Rather, this is revealed as a core mode of domination and control, which threatens intimate aspects of life. Ultimately, the effects of this go beyond individual tragedies and unfulfilled kinship obligations. As the occupations become protracted, social divisions as well as cultural transformations are cemented
Department/s
- Social Anthropology
- Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies (CMES)
- MECW: The Middle East in the Contemporary World
- Department of Sociology
Publishing year
2025-12
Language
English
Pages
9-25
Publication/Series
Kritisk etnografi - Swedish journal of anthropology
Volume
8
Issue
1
Document type
Journal article
Topic
- Social Anthropology
Keywords
- borders
- military occupation
- Palestine
- Georgia
- Western Sahara
- family life
- violence
- military occupation
- Georgia
- Palestine
- Western Sahara
- borders
- family
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 2003-1173