The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Profile photo of Mattias Kärrholm

Mattias Kärrholm

Researcher

Profile photo of Mattias Kärrholm

Environmental Nostalgia and Everyday Aesthetics

Author

  • Anna Petersson
  • Mattias Kärrholm

Summary, in English

How we behave in daily life has an impact on environmental emergencies. In the decisions that we take every day, decisions that are important for the climate, the built environment has a vital but not so noticed part. The project Urban design and everyday life choices recognises the built environment as a co-producer of climate ethics. One of the project studies focuses on everyday choices regarding grocery shopping in the new city district Western Harbour in Malmö; an urban area close to the sea that was built to afford a sustainable and ecologically friendly way of life. In this study, six residents’ experiences of and thoughts about shopping routes and routines have been investigated by using the method of semi-structured qualitative interviews supported by participant produced photographs and captions. Three subject areas have been identified in the collected material and will be examined in this presentation: 1) The branding of the residential area as ecologically sustainable is an ongoing and changing process of resemiotization (cf. Remm, 2016; Barthes, 1957). This affected the residents’ experiences of and visions for their neighbourhood, causing them to reposition themselves within the changing context; 2) Everyday consumer choices were placed in a narrative that fitted with the respondents’ overall idea of what respectable grocery shopping is and should be (cf. Skeggs, 1997). Commodities were placed in a social and cultural perspective, where ethical consumer choices could be seen as symbolically good (Bourdieu, 1979; Appadurai 1986), guiding the informants to take on the role of ascetic grocery shoppers (cf. Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2018); and 3) The territorialisation of shopping routes and routines were affected by aesthetic values linked to nature, beauty, playfulness and surprise, that added positive experiences to the respondents’ everyday life (cf. Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989; Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2018). The built environment in combination with the (bad) weather, the price and quality of goods, unclear information of product origin, as well as picky companion animals, also affected the informants’ possibilities to make ethical consumer choices (cf. Brembech, Hansson & Vayre, 2015). By claiming the term “environmental nostalgia”, which encompasses a search for home, identity, authenticity and reimagination (cf. Chrostowska, 2010; Boym, 2001), the presentation will move towards a discussion where aesthetic experiences and the framing of nature within the built culture are recognised as important parts of sustainable urban environments (cf. Brady, Brook & Prior, 2018).

Department/s

  • Department of Architecture and Built Environment

Publishing year

2021-06-05

Language

English

Document type

Conference - other

Topic

  • Human Geography

Conference name

International Institute of Applied Aesthetics’ (IIAA) International Summer Conference, Aesthetics in the Age of Environmental Crisis

Conference date

2021-06-03 - 2021-06-05

Conference place

Lahti, Finland

Status

Unpublished

Project

  • Urban design and everyday life choices: On the built environment as a co-producer