The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Profile photo of Sarah Anne Rennick

Sarah Anne Rennick

Affiliated Researcher

Profile photo of Sarah Anne Rennick

When Civil Society Sets the Social and Economic Agenda

Author

  • Sarah Anne Rennick
  • Nafissa El Souri

Summary, in English

Since 2011, Moroccan civil society actors have experienced an important political opening that has allowed them to play a much more direct and influential role in the process of policy-making. The National Dialogue that has taken place between the government and civil society in the writing of different pieces of legislation represents a demonstrable step towards increased participation and legitimacy conferred to social actors. Yet at the same time, this process has not been without its controversy and drawbacks: as those participating in the Parallel Dialogues state, the inclusion of civil society in policy-making is perhaps less an attempt at participatory democracy than the redrawing of the red lines in which civil society’s action is constrained. Both experiences – National Dialogue with the government and Parallel Dialogue as an oppositional bloc – have provided Moroccan activists with a breadth of experience not only in the policy-making process but also in the building of coalitions and consensus on policy itself. And beyond the particular framework of policy-making, Moroccan civil society actors have benefited from this post-2011 political opportunity to strengthen their ability to set the public agenda and increase their capacities in both lobbying and development. While civil society actors in Egypt do not currently face a political context favorable to their actions, nor do they possess the margins of manoeuvre to influence policy, they nonetheless strive to remain active and to find alternative modes of engagement that will allow them to fulfill their missions. Thus although a replication of the Moroccan experiences of National and Parallel dialogues are not currently conceivable, there are still lessons for actionable strategies that can be gleaned from the Moroccan experience and applied in Egypt, and indeed farther afield.

Department/s

  • Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies (CMES)

Publishing year

2017

Language

English

Publication/Series

Civil Society and Public Policy Formation : Strategies from Morocco and Egypt

Document type

Report chapter

Publisher

Arab Reform Initiative

Topic

  • Political Science

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 979-10-93214-03-0