The main aim of the cross comparison is to determine whether there is a relationship between the forms of rural livelihood (and class position) and political mobilization against SHP construction.
Analyse of rural mobilizations
The article offers a multilayered relational framework to analyse rural mobilizations. Through a comparative spatial analysis of material and immaterial territories, Sinem Kavak argue that the spatio‐economic transformation of the localities that unevenly transform rural settings in terms of production and consumption activities have an impact on the patterns, discourses, and agency in contemporary “rural” mobilizations.
This is especially observable with regard to upward mobility and the middle‐classization processes embedded in crop system and household accumulation opportunities.
The children of upwardly mobile farmers who became city‐based middle‐class actors tend to present an estheticized and carnivalesque framing in their resistance strategies through the re‐invention of traditions and culture, whereas the lower‐class peasants voice their grievances based strictly on material concerns.
Sinem Kavaks latest article titled "Rethinking the political economy of rural struggles in Turkey: Space, structures, and altered agencies" is published with open access at Journal of Agrarian Change.
Photo by Scancode Productions on Unsplash